Skip to content

Trust-based recommendation: an empirical analysis

The use of trust in recommender systems has been shown to improve the accuracy of rating predictions, especially in the case where a user’s rating significantly differs from the average. Different techniques have been used to incorporate trust into recommender systems, each showing encouraging results. However, the lack of trust information available in public datasets has limited the empirical analysis of these techniques and trust-based recommendation in general, with most analysis limited a single dataset.

In this paper, we provide a more complete empirical analysis of trust-based recommendation. By making use of a method that infers trust between users in a social graph, we are able to apply trust-based recommendation techniques to three separate datasets. From this, we measure the overall accuracy of each technique in terms of the Mean Absolute Error (MAE), the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) as well as measuring the prediction coverage of each technique. We thus provide a comparison and analysis of each technique on all three datasets.

Daire O’Doherty, Salim Jouili, and Peter Van Roy, Trust-based recommendation: an empirical analysis, proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Social Network Mining and Analysis SNA-KDD, Beijing, China, ACM, July 2012.

Click here to access the paper.

Releated Posts

Insights from GTC Paris 2025

Among the NVIDIA GTC Paris crowd was our CTO Sabri Skhiri, and from quantum computing breakthroughs to the full-stack AI advancements powering industrial digital twins and robotics, there is a lot to share! Explore with Sabri GTC 2025 trends, keynotes, and what it means for businesses looking to innovate.
Read More

Development & Evaluation of Automated Tumour Monitoring by Image Registration Based on 3D (PET/CT) Images

Tumor tracking in PET/CT is essential for monitoring cancer progression and guiding treatment strategies. Traditionally, nuclear physicians manually track tumors, focusing on the five largest ones (PERCIST criteria), which is both time-consuming and imprecise. Automated tumor tracking can allow matching of the numerous metastatic lesions across scans, enhancing tumor change monitoring.
Read More