Skip to content

An empirical comparison of graph databases

In recent years, more and more companies provide services that can not be anymore achieved efficiently using relational databases. As such, these companies are forced to use alternative database models such as XML databases, object-oriented databases, document-oriented databases and, more recently graph databases. Graph databases only exist for a few years. Although there have been some comparison attempts, they are mostly focused on certain aspects only.
In this paper, we present a distributed graph database comparison framework and the results we obtained by comparing four important players in the graph databases market: Neo4j, OrientDB, Titan and DEX.

 

Salim Jouili, and Valentin Vansteenberghe, An empirical comparison of graph databases, proceedings of the 2013 ASE/IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Washington D.C., USA, September 2013.

Click here to access the paper.

Releated Posts

Insights from GTC Paris 2025

Among the NVIDIA GTC Paris crowd was our CTO Sabri Skhiri, and from quantum computing breakthroughs to the full-stack AI advancements powering industrial digital twins and robotics, there is a lot to share! Explore with Sabri GTC 2025 trends, keynotes, and what it means for businesses looking to innovate.
Read More

Development & Evaluation of Automated Tumour Monitoring by Image Registration Based on 3D (PET/CT) Images

Tumor tracking in PET/CT is essential for monitoring cancer progression and guiding treatment strategies. Traditionally, nuclear physicians manually track tumors, focusing on the five largest ones (PERCIST criteria), which is both time-consuming and imprecise. Automated tumor tracking can allow matching of the numerous metastatic lesions across scans, enhancing tumor change monitoring.
Read More