Skip to content

An empirical comparison of graph databases

In recent years, more and more companies provide services that can not be anymore achieved efficiently using relational databases. As such, these companies are forced to use alternative database models such as XML databases, object-oriented databases, document-oriented databases and, more recently graph databases. Graph databases only exist for a few years. Although there have been some comparison attempts, they are mostly focused on certain aspects only.
In this paper, we present a distributed graph database comparison framework and the results we obtained by comparing four important players in the graph databases market: Neo4j, OrientDB, Titan and DEX.

 

Salim Jouili, and Valentin Vansteenberghe, An empirical comparison of graph databases, proceedings of the 2013 ASE/IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Washington D.C., USA, September 2013.

Click here to access the paper.

Releated Posts

Development & Evaluation of Automated Tumour Monitoring by Image Registration Based on 3D (PET/CT) Images

Tumor tracking in PET/CT is essential for monitoring cancer progression and guiding treatment strategies. Traditionally, nuclear physicians manually track tumors, focusing on the five largest ones (PERCIST criteria), which is both time-consuming and imprecise. Automated tumor tracking can allow matching of the numerous metastatic lesions across scans, enhancing tumor change monitoring.
Read More

Insights from Data & AI Tech Summit Warsaw 2025

11 editions later, one of the biggest technological conferences in Central Europe changed its name to reflect the latest technological advancements. The BIG DATA TECHNOLOGY WARSAW SUMMIT became the DATA & AI WARSAW TECH SUMMIT, and the conference provided a rich platform for gaining fresh perspectives on data and AI. Our CTO, Sabri Skhiri, was present to gather the insights. Here’s a rundown of the key trends, keynotes and talks that took place.
Read More