Skip to content

The Building Blocks of a Responsible AI Practice: An Outlook on the Current Landscape

For AI-driven companies, awareness of the urgency of the responsible application of AI became essential with the increase of interest from different stakeholders. Responsible artificial intelligence (RAI) emerged as a practice to guide the design, development, deployment, and use of AI systems to ensure benefit to users and those impacted by the systems’ outcomes. This benefit is achieved through trustworthy models and strategies that assimilate ethical principles to ensure compliance with regulations and standards for long-term trust. However, RAI comes with the challenge of lack of standardization when it comes to which principles to adopt, what they mean, and how they can be operationalized.

This survey aims to bridge the gap between principles and practice through a study of different approaches taken in the literature and the proposition of a foundational framework.


The paper will be published soon in a special issue of IEEE Intelligent Systems dedicated to AI Ethics and Trust: From Principles to Practice. Unfortunately, It will only be available to subscribers, but do not hesitate to contact us for more information or the pre-print version!


Maryem Marzouk, Cyrine Zitoun, Oumaima Belghith, Sabri Skhiri, The Building Blocks of a Responsible AI Practice: An Outlook on the Current Landscape, published in IEEE Intelligent Systems (2023).

Releated Posts

Insights from GTC Paris 2025

Among the NVIDIA GTC Paris crowd was our CTO Sabri Skhiri, and from quantum computing breakthroughs to the full-stack AI advancements powering industrial digital twins and robotics, there is a lot to share! Explore with Sabri GTC 2025 trends, keynotes, and what it means for businesses looking to innovate.
Read More

Development & Evaluation of Automated Tumour Monitoring by Image Registration Based on 3D (PET/CT) Images

Tumor tracking in PET/CT is essential for monitoring cancer progression and guiding treatment strategies. Traditionally, nuclear physicians manually track tumors, focusing on the five largest ones (PERCIST criteria), which is both time-consuming and imprecise. Automated tumor tracking can allow matching of the numerous metastatic lesions across scans, enhancing tumor change monitoring.
Read More